New Braunfels Logo
File #: 24-1479    Name:
Type: Report Status: Individual Item Ready
File created: 11/8/2024 In control: Board of Adjustment
On agenda: 11/21/2024 Final action:
Title: ZB24-0013 Hold a public hearing and consider a request for a variance to Section 3.3-2(b)(1)(i) to allow the height of a single-family dwelling to exceed the maximum 35-foot height by 12 feet in the R-2 (Single and Two-Family District), addressed at 418 Lakeview Blvd.
Attachments: 1. Aerial Map, 2. Proposed Site Plan, 3. Front Elevation, 4. Side Elevation, 5. Property Photos, 6. Notification Map, List & Responses

PRESENTER: Presenter

Applicant/Owner: John Ewald

Body

SUBJECT: Title

ZB24-0013 Hold a public hearing and consider a request for a variance to Section 3.3-2(b)(1)(i) to allow the height of a single-family dwelling to exceed the maximum 35-foot height by 12 feet in the R-2 (Single and Two-Family District), addressed at 418 Lakeview Blvd.

Header

BACKGROUND RATIONAL:

Case #: ZB24-0013

 

Applicant:                      John Ewald

/Owner                     232 Laguna Rio

                     Seguin, TX 78155

                     (830) 305-1648 ׀ john.e@ewaldkubota.com

 

Staff Contact:                      Mary Lovell, Senior Planner

                     (830) 221-4051 ׀ mlovell@newbraunfels.gov

 

The subject property is located on the southeast side of Lakeview Blvd in the Landa Park Highlands Subdivision. The lot is 578.5 feet in length and has a street frontage of 143 feet. The rear of the lot backs up to the Comal River.

 

The applicant's request is to build a main dwelling that is approximately 47 feet in height, as well as a garage and storage space on the property. The lot is larger than many city residential lots and has many large oak trees on the property. The lot has a downward slope in the rear of the property as shown on the proposed elevation drawings.

 

The applicant has answered the following six questions to support the requested variance:

 

1) That there are special circumstances or conditions affecting the land involved such that the strict application of the provisions of this Chapter would deprive the applicant of the reasonable use of land; The applicant states, “The lot is approximately two acres and has many large heritage oak trees on it greater than 24 inches in diameter. Because we are a family of nine, we would like to build a large house to accommodate two parents and seven children (and potential grandchildren). To keep the footprint of the house and driveway small enough to fit between the heritage oak trees, the house we are proposing would be taller than the allowed 35 feet,” and

 

2) That the variance is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a substantial property right of the applicant; The applicant states, “The city has an ordinance on commercial property limiting the removal of heritage oak trees greater than 24” diameter. Although this is a residential lot, we recognize the importance of preserving live oak trees of this stature and wish to keep as many as possible,” and

 

3) That the granting of the variance will not be detrimental to the public health, safety or welfare, or injurious to other property within the area; The applicant states, “No, granting of the variance is not injurious to the surrounding properties,” and

 

4) Granting of the variance will not have the effect of preventing the orderly use of other land within the area in accordance with the provisions of this Chapter; The applicant states, “Granting of the variance will not prevent the orderly use of other properties,” and

 

5) That an undue hardship exists; The applicant states, “Yes, the trees located toward the front of the lot and the constrained building area create a hardship due to the need to preserve the large heritage trees. Another hardship is the steeply sloped area at the rear of the lot where it is not feasible to build a structure. Because of these hardships, there is a limited area to build a house, and the topography, and the preservation of heritage trees, create an undue hardship. The hardship limits the area to build a home and necessitates building a taller home to include all of the bedrooms to properly house nine residents,” and

 

6) That the granting of a variance will be in harmony with the spirit and purpose of these regulations. The applicant states “Granting the variance will be in harmony with the spirit of the City’s regulations.”

 

Per Section 2.2-3 of the Zoning Ordinance, a variance shall not be granted to relieve a self-created or personal hardship, nor based solely on economic gain or loss, nor shall it permit any person the privilege in developing a parcel of land not permitted by Chapter 144 to other parcels of land in the particular zoning district. No variance may be granted that results in undue hardship upon another parcel of land.

 

GENERAL INFORMATION:

Size:

Lot area: 82,724.80 square feet

Lot depth: 578.5 feet

Lot width: 143 feet

 

Variance Request Due to Notice of Violation:

No

 

Surrounding Zoning and Land Use:

 

North  - Single-Family Residences

South - Comal River

East - Single-Family Residences

West - Comal River

 

Notification

Public hearing notices were sent to 12 owners of property within 200 feet of the subject property. To date, no responses in opposition have been received.